Friday, 17 July 2026

If you are permitted to enter

 

If you are permitted to enter Translated by Google 2026

 


From Author ;
This translation has some inaccurate turn of phrases.
So sorry.


In April 1969, I successfully transferred to the third year of the Department of Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Wako University. When I first visited Wako, probably one day in February, with my transfer application documents, I must have been nervous, because I have absolutely no memory of the scenery around Wako-zaka, where winter rice paddies must have stretched in a long, narrow strip along the road between the university and the Odakyu Line at that time. I only remember thinking, as I climbed Wako-zaka, "Ah, this university is built in a good location." I was born and raised in the western suburbs of Tokyo, at the foot of the Sayama Hills. The hills are not just familiar to me, but deeply ingrained in me. In a room at the university, I was concerned about whether the documents, especially the subjects and credits I had acquired, met Wako's transfer requirements. In the first year, the number of Chinese language courses, which are specialized subjects, was overwhelmingly large, and although I wanted to specialize in Japanese literature, I had not acquired any credits of a similar nature other than the general education course "Literature."

The person who assisted me was a young Masafumi Yamazaki, who would later achieve leading academic accomplishments in fields such as vocational education. Professor Yamazaki's warmth during our meeting truly soothed my anxious heart. I told him what I had been thinking beforehand: "I haven't taken any specialized courses related to Japanese literature, so if I apply to the literature department, will I have to transfer in as a second-year student?" He replied, "The second year of the literature department is full, so we are not accepting transfer students this year." He continued, "However, there are openings in the third year, so we will be accepting applications. If you apply, I think it will be as a third-year student." He then took my credit history sheet and examined it. At that time, I thought it would be almost impossible to transfer directly to the third year since I had absolutely no experience in Japanese literature. However, I was truly relieved by the professor's response after he examined my credit history sheet. The professor calmly and gently explained to me, reassuring me, "While your credit acquisition situation is different from Wako, your total number of credits meets the requirements. It's true that Wako includes specialized literature-related subjects from the first year, but in your case, you've taken many specialized Chinese language subjects, so if you review those, you should meet the requirements for completing the second year at Wako."

Without touching on any personal circumstances, such as why I aimed for Wako University, he reassured me by saying, "Your eligibility to take the entrance exam is fine, even with a three-year transfer." The feeling that he was such a kind teacher remains completely unchanged even after more than half a century; in fact, it has grown even stronger and continues to linger in my heart. Much later, in the 1990s, when information disclosure via the Internet became commonplace, I learned from back issues of student newsletters posted on the Wako University homepage that Professor Yamazaki had played a central role in the preparation staff for the establishment of Wako University, handling complex tasks, including legal matters. I have always held deep respect and admiration for a professor who, amidst such busy days, could speak to a transfer student with such meticulous care and kindness. In 1969, I had absolutely no other transfer options besides Wako University. Looking back now, I wonder what I would have done if it hadn't worked out, but when Wako University was featured in the Asahi Shimbun in January of that year, 1969, as one of several new universities, I chose Wako without considering any factors such as its size or the professors who worked there.

Mr. Kamiyama, a senior alumnus of my high school who lives in my town and continues his research even though he is over eighty years old, specializes in modern Japanese history and later became the principal of a high school. When he was discussing the collected works of Professor Tsuneyuki Kawasaki at his home, he said that my encounter with Professor Tsuneyuki Kawasaki of Wako High School was "fateful." Until then, I had never thought of it that way, but now I realize that it was indeed fateful. Perhaps my transfer to Wako High School was also fateful. When one grows old, as the French philosopher Gabriel Marcel once said, "when one's entire self becomes a distant landscape," will one realize anew that there were several such things that happened.

There was another major turning point for Wako. In 1978, my eighth year as a teacher, I sent off my graduating class as the homeroom teacher for the third year students at my second school, Tokyo Metropolitan Ome Higashi High School. At the same time, in April 1979, I also began to think about pursuing a new direction, and I submitted a transfer request that year, incorporating my desire to transfer to an evening part-time high school and resume some kind of new study, such as a master's program, during the day. However, even in February 1979, there was no prospect of a transfer to an evening high school, so I prepared to transfer to a regular full-time high school and had already interviewed at one Tokyo Metropolitan high school. On the day of my final acceptance interview, as I was putting on my shoes at the entrance, the phone rang. When I picked up the receiver, it was the principal calling to confirm that a position had opened up in the evening part-time high school and asking if I wanted to apply. I accepted on the spot and went for an interview at Tokyo Metropolitan Agricultural High School in Fuchu City, and my transfer there was quickly decided a few days later. If I hadn't received that phone call that day, I would have been transferred to a full-time school, and my hopes of continuing my daytime studies would have been impossible for the time being.

However, around the end of February 1979, the university had already entered the end of the academic year, and it was difficult to apply for master's programs and other programs at the university at that point. However, because I was a high school teacher and a graduate of Wako, I received a new university guide from Wako every year. When I opened it again, it seemed that it was still possible to apply for the advanced course. There was no application form for the advanced course included, so I think I clearly wrote "Application for Advanced Course" on a regular university entrance application form and sent the documents to Wako. If it didn't work out, I could always transfer to the evening program, so I thought I would consider a new direction the following year. Fortunately, Wako accepted my application for the advanced course, and in April 1979, I took the exam and was able to enter the advanced course.

At that time, I vaguely thought that if I were to enter a master's program, given my experience as a high school Japanese language teacher, I might be able to apply for a program in Japanese linguistics or Japanese language history. I think I was thinking that from there, I might be able to move towards language in general later on. However, in the end of the academic year, Wako was the only option left, and I ended up taking the entrance exam once again as a humanities major student in the Faculty of Humanities, where I had studied before. What came to mind at that time was Professor Tsuneyuki Kawasaki's history of Buddhism, and the history of Japanese Buddhism, which I had only briefly researched during my undergraduate years, and that perhaps I could at least read some ancient Japanese Chinese texts. In that short amount of time, I seriously considered what my immediate research topic should be. However, more than eight years had already passed since graduation, so I hesitated to contact Professor Kawasaki in advance, and I took the exam without making any such contact.

There was an English reading comprehension test in the classroom, followed by an oral examination in a separate room. There were two professors: Professor Shigeru Araki, a literature specialist in medieval and early modern Japan, and another professor whose name I did not know. Professor Araki mainly conducted the examination, and at the end he asked if I had contacted Professor Kawasaki, to which I simply replied that I had not yet. I wondered if that was what I should have done. Fortunately, after passing the exam, I called Professor Kawasaki and asked for his guidance, which marked the beginning of a seven-year period of further study under him as a postgraduate and research student. If my transfer to the evening division had been decided promptly, or regardless of whether I passed or failed, I might have aimed to take the master's exam at another university instead of Wako, which at the time did not have a master's program. But things unfolded this way. Perhaps that, too, was a matter of fate.

In the spring of my second year of high school, after reading Louis Heymond's "The White Virgin Land," I submitted my ethics and society end-of-year report, albeit a naive one, concluding that despite the difficulties, I would choose free will over religious determinism. From that point until now, I don't think my fundamental stance has changed drastically. Long ago, during a conversation with my father, he casually told me that he thought fate existed. As a young boy, I was dissatisfied, but from then until his death at the age of eighty-two, he always supported me in all my actions, telling me to "live as you please." Now, with deep gratitude, and adding the words, "Perhaps fate does exist," there are countless things I want to tell my father.

Let's go back to my transfer in the spring of 1969. Thanks to Professor Yamazaki's kind encouragement, I decided to take the transfer entrance exam. It was here that I met Professor Kenzo Miyazaki of the Department of Literature. I remember there was an English reading comprehension section in the written exam in the classroom, but I can't remember if there was a free writing or assigned essay section. After that, I think I moved to Professor Miyazaki's research lab in the research building and went there alone. There I had an interview. I think I was the only one taking the third-year transfer entrance exam for the Department of Literature that day. The research building was eerily quiet.

Towards the end of my examination in Professor Miyazaki's laboratory, he asked me about my favorite poets. I mentioned, among them, Shuntaro Tanikawa's poetry collection "Two Billion Light Years of Solitude," which I had seen at the Tokyo Metropolitan Ome Library and which he had found deeply impressive when he was 21 years old. However, I can no longer remember who else I mentioned. Perhaps I also mentioned Junzaburo Nishiwaki. His "The Traveler Does Not Return" greatly changed my image of poetry up to that point, and I repeatedly read it because I could feel the atmosphere of the Tama region, including Kodaira, in the content of the poem. I also liked Sakutaro Hagiwara and Tatsuji Miyoshi, but I don't remember if I mentioned their names. Finally, the professor said to me, "I don't know how your written exam went, but if you passed, come to my house."

After passing the entrance exam for Wako, probably sometime in March before I even started attending school, I visited Professor Miyazaki's home. I still wonder how that was possible, but I can only assume that he gave me his phone number after the interview. Otherwise, I wouldn't have been able to find out the location of his home in Nakano or decide on a date for my visit. His house was impressive, surrounded by a black-painted wall, and since my first impression of him during the exam was that he was somewhat imposing, I was probably quite nervous. He invited me into the drawing-room and we talked about many things. I only remember some of the details now, but one thing he mentioned was the research he was currently working on. "I'm currently researching Irako Seihaku," he said. I knew the poet's name, but I had never read any of his poems, so I just listened.

My professor spoke about Seihaku, but sadly, I can't remember it at all now. According to the Daijirin dictionary (Sanseido, 1988), Irako Seihaku (1877-1946) was described as "a central figure of the 'Bunko' school as a fantastical, mysterious, and exquisite symbolic poet. His poetry collection is 'Kujaku-sen' (Peacock Ship)." After transferring to the university, I took my professor's lecture on modern and contemporary poetry, and I learned that he highly valued Kambara Ariake (1876-1952) and Usuda Kyūkin (1887-1945), who are representative Japanese symbolic poets, but I don't think he made any special mention of Irako Seihaku. Perhaps he kept it to himself.

After transferring to the university, I was always puzzled as to why my professor, who was so upright and always made careful decisions, even to the point of being the head of academic affairs, would say, "If you pass, come to my house." Whenever I talked with my wife about the past, it always came up. My wife was also puzzled each time, saying, "I can't believe something like that happened." And why would he tell me that he was researching the Meiji-era poet Irako Seihaku, when I had absolutely no background in classical Japanese literature? Much later, when I began to see my younger self as someone I encountered in my youth, like a faint distant landscape, I began to understand my professor's feelings a little.

This relates to the time I visited the home of Professor Tsuguo Ando, ​​a foreign language professor, poet, and French literature scholar, without an appointment, and he warmly welcomed me. I think he treated me with generosity because, even though I was an uneducated and untalented young man, I was serious about learning, I didn't seem to read much literature, but I liked poetry, and I seemed to have some ambition—a country boy. My close friend from high school, Kaneko, said to my face, "Are you really going to study physics?" But I probably grew up with a glimmer of my original optimism. I liked languages, but I didn't have much ability in them, and although I longed for mathematics, I only scratched the surface of modern mathematics before growing up. I seemed to like poetry, but I didn't seem to be able to write much poetry either. That's the kind of person I was, for sure.

But somewhere within all of that, there was always a glimmer of seriousness, wasn't there? As an outsider, I was such a poor young man. At Kitatama High School, a Tokyo Metropolitan school located in Tachikawa City, where I was first assigned, the art club students drew detailed yet somewhat comical caricatures of most of the teachers, including their toes, and displayed them in the hallway near the staff room on the second floor. I think there were nearly 30 of them. Mr. Saito, an art teacher who often helped me when I was inexperienced, invited me, saying, "Tanaka, Tanaka, they're funny, come and see them in the hallway." There was a variety of them: the physics teacher dropping an apple, the teacher pushing his desk and walking out into the corridor, the teacher with a sour face like a pickled plum, and so on. But of course, everyone's feet were on the ground. Amidst all that, I was the only one flying through the air like Superman. Mr. Saito found it amusing and teased me, saying, "So this is what Tanaka looks like." There were days like that.

That's why Professor Ando of the Faculty of Foreign Languages ​​and Professor Miyazaki of Wako supported me, even though I was as unreliable as a paper doll, yet somehow endearing. Professor Saeki, who taught me haiku, did the same. Now I can only feel gratitude, unable to reciprocate in any way. To return to the story. When Professor Miyazaki finished his talk, he led me to the second floor of his house. Almost the entire spacious second floor was his library. Rows and rows of bookshelves lined the floor, each packed with books. From among them, he took out a collection of poems and showed it to me. It was none other than a copy that Nakahara Chūya had personally signed and sent to Professor Miyazaki as a dedication. When I left his house, he gave me a book on classical grammar that he had written himself. He also added words of encouragement, telling me to become a specialist. And so I continued my studies at Wako.

Two years passed in the blink of an eye, and in early spring, around February of 1971, as graduation approached, I received a postcard from Professor Miyazaki. The contents were roughly as follows: "Congratulations, Tanaka-kun, your appointment at Kitatama High School has been confirmed. The principal contacted me yesterday." The next day, I visited Professor Miyazaki's office to express my gratitude. He smiled and told me, "The principal of Kitatama is a junior of mine from university, and he contacted me with an inquiry about Tanaka-kun, so I recommended him, and everything will be fine now." And so, I was interviewed by Professor Miyazaki, enrolled in the school, and graduated with his recommendation. I wonder if this, too, was a matter of fate.

Even after graduation, I visited the professor several times at the beginning of each year with two friends. One New Year's Day, in the tatami room we were shown into, the professor pointed near the ceiling and said with a smile, "This year, for the first time in a long time, I went to get a good luck charm, so I immediately put it up facing south." Sakai and Yamamoto, who had become teachers, were always with us. I think this New Year's tradition continued until everyone became busy with weddings and raising children. The professor always welcomed us kindly and gently. The professor also accepted the position of the first president of the Wako University Japanese Literature Society, which was established by graduates of the Japanese Literature major in the Department of Literature at Wako University, and became an alumni association and research group for professors and graduates. After the standing committee meetings held at Nakano Sun Plaza, it was a pleasure for us standing committee members to be able to talk with the professors who came to the meeting at a coffee shop on Nakano Sun Road. Professors Miyazaki, Ikeda, Saeki, Sugiyama, and Takeda were often together, making it feel like a small class reunion. We were all still young, nearing the end of our twenties, and now those days are incredibly nostalgic.


Tokyo
2026

Dedicated to the days 2023

 

 

​Dedicated to the days


2023


Description 2008-2018

  

Description

 2008-2018

 
For language study, its theoretical  description is a very important role for understandability and clarity of the paper. Till my age 30s , I had never satisfied my way to study and write. Philosophical and philological methods have been felt somewhere ambiguous and unreliable to proceed sensitive research of language.
My great turn occurred at the relearning of mathematics, especially geometrical algebra. In the past 1970s, I was also one of the many influenced students from Bourbaki, that was the brightest star in the universe of minute and rigorous road to the destination. But my poor way was always unevenness and wide deep fog was surrounded in the vast field in front of mine. What at last I  arrived at the gate of confirmed style was the beginning of the 21st century. At that time I wrote several trial papers related with language universals but still never had been satisfied for their ambiguity and intensive styles. My next crux came at my study of new wave of algebraic geometry, complex manifold deformation at 2008. Its result became some papers named Complex Manifold Deformation Theory. This was the very fresh and clear way to study language for me.
 
Conjecture A
1. Distance of Word
2. Reflection of Word
3. Uniqueness of Word
4. Amplitude of Meaning Minimum
5. Time of Word
6. Orbit of Word
Conjecture B
1.  Map between Words
2.  Understandability of Language
 
 
Tokyo
15 August 2013

Person 2018

 

Person 2018

 

 
  1. AMINO Yoshihiko, historian of modern Japan
  2. ​​At the campus of university
  3. Coffee shop named California
  4. Fortuitous meeting
  5. Glitter of youth through philosophy and mathematics in 1970s
  6. KAJIMURA Hideki   His Korean Classroom
  7. Letter to the library  Short autobiography between 1969 and 1986
  8. NISHI Junzo, Philosopher of Modern Japan
  9. Intuition and Mathematics
  10. Natary MURAVIJOVA  Russian Language Class
  11. ​​ONO Shinobu and Bernhard Karlgren
  12. Papa Wonderful 20 University
  13. Under the dim light​​
 
Tokyo
30 May 2018

Person 2 2016

 

 

Person 2

2016 


 
  1. BOURBAKI Nicolas
  2. CHADWICK John
  3. CHEN Donghai
  4. CHINO Eiichi
  5. CHO Shokichi
  6. CHOMSKY Noam
  7. DUAN Yucai
  8. FUKAYA Kenji
  9. Gödel Kurt
  10. JAKOBSON Roman
  11. KAJIMURA Hideki
  12. KANEKO Yutaka
  13. KARCEVSKIJ Sergej
  14. KARLGREN Bernhard
  15. KONTSEVICH Maxim
  16. KURATA Reijiro
  17. LITTLE Williams
  18. MURAVIJOVA Natary
  19. NAMBU Yoichiro
  20. NISHI Junzo
  21. ONO Shinobu
  22. PASCAL Blaise
  23. PENROSE Roger
  24. SAEKI Shizuto
  25. SAITO Kohei
  26. SAPIR Edward
  27. SHAKESPEARE William
  28. SINAI Yakob G.
  29. SONTAG Susan
  30. TAKENOUCHI Osamu
  31. TAKEUCHI Gaishi
  32. TAN Sitong
  33. TANIYAMA Yutaka
  34. TODA Yukinobu
  35. TOMONAGA Shin-ichiro
  36. VENTRIS Michael
  37. von NEUMANN John 
  38. WANG Guowei
  39. WANG Niansun
  40. WANG Yinzhi
  41. WAUGH Linda
  42. WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig
     



    Read more: https://srfl-collection.webnode.com/news/memory-essay-appendix-2016/

    Read more: https://srfl-lab.webnode.page/news/person-2/

    TANAKA Akio
    Sekinan Library
    2016

    Essay Chronicle 2015

     

    Essay Chronicle 2015

     


     Language and Mathematics

    1. Time in Word
    2. Language and Dimension
    3. The days when I was thinking on Energy Distance Theory
    4. For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig Revised with Symplectic Language Theory and Floer Homology Language
    5. Pleasure of Mathematics 
    6. The days of von Neumann Algebra
    7. The days between von Neumann Algebra and Complex Manifold Deformation Theory



    Elements of Language
    1. Disposition of Language
    2. Distance of Word
    3. Flow of Language
    4. Boundary of Language

    CHINO, Karcevskij and Prague
    1. Half Farewell to the Linguistic Circle of Prague and Sergej Karcevskij
    2. I need not more wander the bookshop streets
    3. Prague in 1920s
    4. CHINO Eiichi and Golden Prague
    5. Coffee shop named California

    Enchanted with language and mathematics
    1. Andre Martinet
    2. Charles Bally 
    3. Read Andre Weil 
    4. Bourbaki' ELEMENTS DE MATHEMATIUE Troisieme edition, 1964 
    5. The Time of Language Ode to The Early Bourbaki To Grothendieck  Note added 

    Wandering between language and philosophy
    1.
    1. For WITTGENSTEIN Revised / Position of Language / 10 December 2005 - 3 August 2012
    2. The Time of Wittgenstein /20 January 2012
    3. Citation from Ludwig Wittgenstein / 7 February 2012
    4. THE ROAD TO REALITY A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, 2005 by Roger Penrose / 25 October 2012
    2.
    1. The First Paper on Inherent Time in Word / 26 July 2014
    2. 40 years passed from I read WANG Guowei / 16 November 2013
    3. Half farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague / 23 October 2013 / With References
    3.
    1. Substantiality Dedicated to SAPIR Edward / 27 February 2005
    2. Edward Sapir's Language, 1921 / 5 September 2014
    3. Macro Time and Micro Time / 24 July 2013
    4.
    1. Roman Jakobson / 16 July 2012

    Winding road to physics
    When I was a student of high school, I hoped to learn physics at university. But from various reasons in fact I learnt language at university on the other still longing for physics.
    After graduation I once worked as a high school teacher and eight years passing over I returned to university for investigating language study. On the way I again met CHINO Eiichi in 1979, from whom I ever learnt Russian in 1969. By his teaching I had distinct aim for my study on language, making clear description to others using mathematics being assisted with physical thinking or approach. Mathematics was always set in my mind but my talent was not overtaken to its hardness. But aiming clear description to every situation I decided to learn again or thrice to make a new stage where I decided to come back to my starting point of youth being attracted to physics.
    1.
    1. Now I am Enough Old for Remembering the Past / 27 September 2012
    2.
    1. To my dear friend, KANEKO Yutaka / 22 May 2013
    2. Half farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague / 23 October 2013 
    3. Perhaps Return to Physics /16 August 2014
    3.
    1. Distance Theory Algebraically Supplemented / Brane Simplified Model / Bend /17 October 2007
    2. Distance Theory Algebraically Supplemented / Brane Simplified Model / Distance / 26 October 2007 
    4.
    1. Substantiality Dedicated to SAPIR Edward / 27 February 2005
    2. Language, Amalgamation of Mathematics and Physics / 15 April 2014
    5. 
    1. The Complete Works of TANIYAMA Yutaka,1994 / 11 November 2012
    2. Description / 15 August 2013

    Perhaps Return to Physics
    Recently my situation for language research has changed rather drastically. 
    I have loved mathematics ever since I understood that mathematics was the only fantastic way for solving the problems of the nature through absolute clear description.

    When I was at the third grade of the high school
    , I remained in the class room for solving the swing state of a pendulum movement. It was the simple differential equation. But at that time I realised that one short equation contained the whole universe of a tiny pendulum. it was a real meeting with the mathematics and the our world.
    At high school, I thought that the most fantastic way of life was in physics, especially in theoretical physics.  
    In the autumn 1965, the Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to TOMONAGA Shin-ichiro. In the next morning of announcement, at our mathematics-science class was full of the prize about his award.
    In those days I already  determined my university's speciality to theoretical physics. TOMONAGA's award was the splendid delight for me and the other science- course class mates.
    But various reasons led me to philology at the university life.

    Since then nearly half a century passed by. My study on language was dimmed in the vast historical heritage of linguistics that had surely shown the many results for language. But my mind was not fine on my road up to that time. My object  gradually became to the one that was clear and understandable whoever desire to participate to talk with language. At the result after long winding road  I reached at the concrete place for study. It was the description by mathematics. It was the days of my mid 30s in 1980s. 

    From those days some 20 years passed by. I became at 50s. I had written the short papers  little by little. Mathematics was really free to approach. I freely thought and imagined on language's essential parts. Several models were made for the situation of language's particular phases. But I recognised that mathematics starts at the some axioms and theorems and reached  a curtain high place' situation, which road is absolutely strict and exact and there is perfectly nothing related with real our world's phenomena, in my part on natural language. 

    So recently I began to think that no relation with  models and natural phenomena on language was easily overcome by adopting the physical method using mathematics' various results. perhaps I return to physics which was my favourite in the high school days. Physics connects world and model freely. All the explanations are approximate values for world' phenomena. At this place I can freely adopt the models not thinking the theoretical consistency. 

    Now I am standing  at the physical based place that was dreamt in my high school days.

    References
    1.  Language, amalgamation of mathematics and physics / 13 May 2013     
    2.  True and False / Hierarchy of Language / July 25 – July 27, 2006                                                     
    3. True-false problem of the Crete / 22 July 2013
    4.  Half farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague / 23 October 2013 


    Thanks to physics about which I ever dreamt in my future
    In the days of high school, I deeply dreamt that someday physics would perfectly write over this world's phenomena by the clearest descriptions. So I longed for studying physics in the future. But I selected language's diverse wideness at the university, from where returning the clear descriptive situation represented by physics needed long and winding road for me. Now in my mind probably language and physics or mathematics are happily live together constructing the world's one main frame. I wonder why I took so much time to reach here. Long time ago, at least Pascal's days, philosophy and mathematics were both sides of shield for solving the world's hard problems. It is very appropriate that the fact is solved from every fields not being partitioned any artificial walls. Philosophy may be solved by mathematics and mathematics may opened by physical phenomenon. Now they all became common sense. Only I reached here delaying rather late. I am now situated in tranquil field. Thanks to so many pioneers, especially in mathematics. Also to physics about which I ever dreamt in my future.

    References:
    1. Substantiality Dedicated to SAPIR Edward / 27 February 2005
    2. To my dear friend, KANEKO Yutaka / 22 May 2013
    3. Half farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague / 23 October 2013 
    4. Language, Amalgamation of Mathematics and Physics / 15 April 2014
    5. Perhaps Return to Physics /16 August 2014
    6. Winding road to physics / 10 April 2015

    Preparation for the energy of language
    The energy of language seems to be one of the most fundamental theme for the further step-up  study on language at the present for me. But the theme was hard to put on the mathematical description. Now I present some preparatory  papers written so far.

    1. Potential of Language / Floer Homology Language / 16 June 2009
    2. Homology structure of Word / Floer Homology Language / Tokyo June 16, 2009
    3. Amplitude of meaning minimum / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory / 17 December 2008
    4. Time of Word / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory / 23 December 2008



    Pioneer of language study at Gist of Sekinan Study
    I owe my study to many pioneers of language and mathematics for their many research results.
    At the next I show some essays in which important tips have been presented to my study.
    Tokyo, 7 April 2015, Sekinan Study

    Pioneer
    • Boutbaki, Nicolas
    The Time of Language, Ode to The Early Bourbaki To Grothendieck
    Bourbaki' ELEMENTS DE MATHEMATIUE Troisieme edition, 1964

    • Karlgren, Bernhard
    ONO Shinobu and Bernhard Karlgren

    • Karcevskij, Sergej
    Meaning Minimum On Roman Jakobson, Sergej Karcevskij and CHINO Eiichi
    Half Farewell to the Linguistic Circle of Prague and Sergej Karcevskij
    Sergej Karcevskij, Soul of Language
    Gift from Sergej Karcevskij
    Follower of Sergej Karcevskij
    For KARCEVSKIJ Sergej
    • Jakobson, Roman
    Meaning Minimum On Roman Jakobson, Sergej Karcevskij and CHINO Eiichi

    • Sapir, Edward 
    Edward Sapir, Language, 1921
    Substantiality

    • Saussure, Ferdinand de
    Uniformity For SAUSSURE Ferdinand

    • WANG Guowei
    The Time of WANG Guowei
    40 years passed from I read WANG Guowei
    • von Neumann
    The days of von Neumann Algebra
    The days between von Neumann Algebra and Complex Manifold Deformation Theory
    • Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    The Time of Wittgenstein
    For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig Revised with Symplectic Language Theory and Floer Homology Language




    Language and Pioneers
     - Sapir, Jakobson, Karcevskij, Wittgenstein, Grothendieck, Karlgren, Ono and Chino


    1. Edward Sapir, Language, 1921
    2. Meaning Minimum
    3. ONO Shinobu and Bernhard Karlgren
    4. Prague in 1920s
    5. Non-symmetry, 1920s' Prague and Sergej Karcevskij's "Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique"
    6. The Time of language - Ode to The Early Bourbaki and Grothendieck
    7. The Time of WITTGENSTEIN 
    8. Citation from Ludwig Wittgenstein



    A Very Happy New Year 2015 
    and 
    Many Thanks for reading SIL's essays and papers.

    I was born in 1947 and become 68 years old this summer.
    My unripeness to language study has come to the declining years.
    Return to physics or mathematics is almost alike to back to youth age, when almost every day solving rudimentary problems for entire interest to unknown world.

    In my mind there still are some hard themes to challenge, one of which is energy in language. The theme is originated from Edward Sapir, who presented the concept "drift" in Language, 1921. 
    It was the macro and intuitive concept that was supposed by his precise thinking and vast field work of America native's language. I think that I would develop the theme from the physics-mathematics field.

    If there be change in language, from which to which language changes in its true nature?
    At where is there the change's power or energy?


    Refer to the next.
    0. General survey
    1. 5W1H in 2014 / 31 December 2014
    1. Substantiality and time

    1. Substantiality, Dedicated to SAPIR Edward / 27 February 2005 
    2. Macro time and Micro Time / 24 July 2013
    2.Flow and energy 
    1. Flow of Language / Heritage of WANG Guowei and Edward Sapir / 26 September 2014
    2. The days when I was thinking on Energy Distance Theory / 19 December 2014
    4. Stochastic theory, distance, functional, potential with energy

    1. Energy of Language / Stochastic Meaning Theory 4 / 24 July 2008
    2. Energy and Distance / Energy Distance Theory / 31 August 2008
    3. Energy and Functional / Energy Distance Theory /18 October 2008 
    4. Potential of Language / Floer Homology Language / 2009


    5W1H in 2014-2015
    1. How is the time alive in language?
    2. What facts does Three Conjectures for Dimension, Synthesis and Reversion show us?
    3. The days when I was thinking on Energy Distance Theory 
    4. A Trace of student who has been enchanted with language and mathematics
    5. Why is boundary necessary in language?
    6.  At where is there the change's power or energy?


    Tokyo
    5 July 2015 Arranged
    Sekinan Paper